Showing posts with label porsche. Show all posts
Showing posts with label porsche. Show all posts

VW & Chinese Firm BYD Partner For Electric Cars

VW & Chinese Firm BYD Partner For Electric Cars



Volkswagen seems to be on a real tear these days with continuing rumors of them acquiring Porsche outright, and sales numbers indicating that they could displace GM and become the second largest automaker in the world. And now word comes out that VW will be partnering with the Chinese automaker BYD to make electric cars.



A memorandum of understanding was signed last week between Volkswagen and Chinese automaker BYD to partner “in the area of electric mobility” and vehicles using lithium-ion batteries. “Hybrids and electric vehicles will play an increasingly important role [for VW], of course. Particularly for the Chinese market, potential partners such as BYD could support us in quickly expanding our activities,” said Ulrich Hackenberg, Member of the Board for Technical Development at Volkswagen.


A memorandum of understanding (or MOU as the MBA types like to say – essentially it’s the legal version of a promise ring) was signed by BYD Chairman Wang Chuanfu and VW’s Martin Winterkorn in Wolfsburg, Germany last week. Chairman Wang Chuanfu seems to be quite the interesting guy in addition to working with VW. There are reports on the net that he drank (as in swallowed) battery fluid as a stunt recently. I don’t know any more than that, and I didn’t really want to know … the rumors are creepy enough.


Anyway, this is very interesting news that seemed to pop up out of nowhere and caught everybody by surprise. Sure, VW, like very other carmaker on the planet, is interested in EVs and getting as much of a jump as possible. And partnering with a Chinese firm makes a lot of sense, especially if China decides to start taking care of the environment (no grantees there yet). And perhaps VW was spurred to action by another German automaker (cough-cough, Daimler) hooking up with another EV (cough-cough, Tesla) automaker, but who knows.


What is known is that Volkswagen is one of the biggest selling brands in China, and that EVs are going to be pushed into the mainstream, kicking and screaming if necessary, by a combination of proactive government regs, carmakers’ desires to maintain profitability, and the environment letting us know that burning oil is a real killer.


What will come of VW partnering with BYD? Obviously some sort of EV product for the home (Chinese) market, and potentially for the Euro market as well. North America? Time will tell, but by inking this partnership, Volkswagen could have an arrow in its quiver all ready to go if the need or opportunity presents itself in the North American market.


Source: AutoBlogGreen


© Gearhead Media - Please visit Automoblog.net for more great content.

readmore...

2011 Volkswagen Touareg spotted

2011 Volkswagen Touareg spottedVolkswagen is preparing its 2011 Touareg, and the company’s most expensive expensive Stateside offering is slated to lose weight. Although the German automaker is reportedly aiming for a 600 pound drop, shedding 300 pounds is said to be more realistic, and the going speculation is that the mass will be taken out of the SUV’s exceptional four-wheel-drive capability.


In terms of its sheetmetal, the Touareg is being designed by Walter de’Silva, the pen behind the Audi Q7, TT, and A5 among other VW Group products.


Part of the diet challenge is that the SUV is also widely expected to gain a third row, going from a five-seater to a seven-seater, in part to distance itself from its newer, less-expensive Tiguan brethren.


If Car and Driver’s sources are on their game, word is that the U.S. engine lineup won’t change, but the European V10 diesel will be swapped out for the Audi V8 TDI (already employed in the Q7), and the W12 will go on hiatus, possibly to return in sunnier economic times. There will also be a hybrid in the offing, with the same supercharged 3.0-liter V6 setup seen in Porsche’s Cayenne Hybrid.


[Source: Car and Driver]


readmore...

Caterham Sales Up

Caterham Sales Up



Amidst all of the gnashing of teeth and rending of garments about the current world economic situation, Caterham, of all people, is selling more cars now then they were this time last year. And no, it’s not because car buyers suddenly got an infusion of taste.



It would seem that why sales are up, is because former super car owners, looking to cut costs, are deciding to go the Caterham route, rather than more traditional high performance cars.


According to sources, this past April the small volume British company saw both a Ferrari F430 and Porsche 911 Turbo traded-in for the Caterham Seven, and that was just keeping up with a continuing trend. And really, apart from a lack of roof and most creature comforts (heaters are for sissies anyway), a Caterham Seven can easily run with the likes of a Ferrari F430 or a Porsche 911 Turbo … up till about 140 or so. Then the laws of aerodynamics take over, and the brick-like Caterham just can’t get the air to move out of the way fast enough. But when it comes to getting to that sort of speed, Caterhams accelerate like the proverbial bat out of Hell.


The company’s faster models, such as the Cosworth-powered CSR260 can easily out accelerate most supercars, and even the base models are pretty darn quick, able to post zero to sixty times and skidpad numbers in the top two or three percent of the car world. And some of the higher output models have been known to comprehensively beat things like Suzuki Hayabusa super bikes.


And Caterhams don’t cost nearly what Porsches or Ferraris cost. Shoot, they seemingly cost about the same as a Hayabusa or a Ducati. In the US, Caterham’s range starts at around $30,000.



Yes, they’re kits and yes, you have to build them yourself (or have someone build one for you), but they are seriously high performance cars. Even with smaller four cylinder engines, a Seven can go from zero to sixty in the five second range and corner at around one G. Since they only weigh around 1000 pounds, performance come easy to a Caterham Seven.


Source: Jalopnik


Photo from Flickr user exfordy


© Gearhead Media - Please visit Automoblog.net for more great content.

readmore...

Ventross Nissan GTR Skyline R35

Ventross Nissan GTR Skyline R35


Lighweight dry carbon fiber aerodynamic package with a front fascia replacement & a full lower rear diffuser. Referring to the VTR Aero Carbon Fiber Front Bumper & Rear Diffuser, Vorsteiner’s Carbon Fiber Honeycomb Matrix structure gives the parts superior firmness, forces and stability compared to the old traditional hand laid carbon fiber and fiberglass materials.


Ventross Nissan GTR Skyline R35


Ventross Nissan GTR Skyline R35


Ventross Nissan GTR Skyline R35


Ventross Nissan GTR Skyline R35


Ventross Nissan GTR Skyline R35




Related posts:

  1. ZELE NISSAN R35 GT-R Complete Edition
  2. The COBRA N+ Tuning Concept for the New Nissan GT-R
  3. Mansory Porsche 997 Tuning

readmore...

Volkswagen Presses Forward With Chattanooga Plant

Months before the full impact of the current global recession kicked in, Volkswagen made a commitment to build a one billion dollar manufacturing facility in Chattanooga, Tennessee. The plant, which will be the first one VW has operated in the US since shutting down its Westmoreland, PA facility in the late 1980s, is expected to build about 150,000 cars annually.


Daytime Fireworks Display Marks Start Of Construction


Volkswagen Presses Forward With Chattanooga PlantYesterday, local and state officials were joined by Volkswagen representatives to begin work on the plant, building a symbolic wall to stress the automaker’s commitment to the Tennessee Valley. In an unusual move, the automaker also launched a daytime fireworks display to herald the start of construction on a plant that may employ as many as 2000 people directly.


The site Volkswagen chose is located on 1580 acres and will soon house several buildings including a body shop, paint shop, assembly and offices. The mid-size model to be manufactured at the plant will be U.S. specific, perhaps based on an existing VW platform but designed more like an American model. Volkswagen says that 30% of the cars will come equipped with the company’s clean burn turbo-diesel technology. The first cars are expected to roll out sometime in 2011.


Volkswagen Aims To Triple Market Share


The Chattanooga plant represents a commitment Volkswagen made last year to triple its annual sales in the US market within the next ten years.  That announcement looked overly ambitious when it was first made, but given the decline of Chrysler and General Motors, Volkswagen may be able to step in and grab market share, perhaps well before the first model rolls out. Year to date, Volkswagen says that its US market share surged by 43%


Last month, I reported that VW’s Audi unit decided to not construct an assembly plant in North America for its upcoming Q3 compact SUV, choosing to use VW’s SEAT plant in Martorell, Spain to build the vehicle.  Audi officials noted that no additional factory capacity was needed, choosing to grab an underutilized facility in the Volkswagen Group arsenal instead.


The New #1 Automobile Manufacturer?


With the Tennessee plant coming online and other strategic moves underway for Volkswagen — including a pending full merger with Porsche — the German automaker is on track to reach their next goal which is to overtake Toyota as the largest automobile manufacturer in the world. That goal looked unrealistic just months ago, but given Toyota’s own troubles, VW may soon become the new #1.



readmore...

No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]

No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]The just-announced fuel economy policy changes demand 42 MPG for cars and 27 MPG for light trucks. A look at the data shows not a single automaker currently meets the new guidelines proposed today.


Using the Model-Year 2009 Fleet Fuel Economy standards provided by the National Highway Safety Transportation Administration (NHTSA), we determined the current ratings for passenger cars and light trucks and compared them to the goal for each of the greater automakers selling cars in the U.S. A few automakers, probable KIA and Hyundai, report their given conditions separately since of a different ownership arrangement. We also took a look at what barriers exist for them reaching those standards.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


BMW


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 27.5 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -14.5 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 23.1 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -3.9 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: BMW currently offers no hybrid or electric vehicles and, as a matter of practice, has been increasing displacement not decreasing it. The use of diesel engines is a step in the right direction but they’re source behind where they destitution to be.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Chrysler


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 28.3 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -13.7 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 23.9 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -3.1 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Chrysler’s biggest problem, in general, is the lack of appealing small cars with good fuel economy. Lacking any realistic vehicle put on the horizon, the Chrysler-FIAT deal was envisioned to solve this issue. Let’s see how that works out for them.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Daimler


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 27.5 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -14.5 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 20.6 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -6.4 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Mercedes-Benz may have to reconsider its policy of bringing over G-wagens and GL-wagens if it doesn’t want to pay a refine, as the light truck numbers are low. The company has hinted at a smaller, possibly marked by electricity, model to bring up the average mileage but how many electric smarts do you need to overweigh an AMG G55?


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Ford


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 31.1 MPG (excluding foreign import)
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -10.9 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 24.7 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -2.3 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Ford sells a lot of trucks. Despite fluctuations in combustibles prices, the F-Series is bread + butter in favor of the company. The adding of EcoBoost should help propel passenger vehicles to a higher overall value, and rumors of similar turbo’ed engines in the pickups should help as abundantly.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


GM


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 31.3 MPG (excluding foreign import)
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -10.7 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 22.5 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -4.5 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Barriers? What Barriers? The Volt will save everything… right? GM could be a victim of its own success if it turns out they start selling far more Camaros than hybrids and other fuel efficient vehicles.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Honda


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 36.5 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -5.5 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 26.2 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -0.8 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Honda typically ranks highest amidst brands, with equal reason they’re doing pretty well. But maybe now we know why they keep delaying the NSX.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Hyundai


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 33.2 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -8.8 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 25.7 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -1.3 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Unlike most Asian brands, Hyundai has picked up steam through moving away from greener vehicles. WIll the Genesis sedan and coupe cut into the gains made by their dinky little Korean hatches?


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Kia


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 33.7 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -8.3 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 24.4 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -2.6 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Kia has human being big barrier to better fuel economy and it’s the Kia Borrego. Since not any some seems to want the $40K truck we don’t see Kia having a hard time satirical it out of the lineup.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Mazda


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 32.2/31.0 MPG (Import/Domestic)
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -9.8 MPG/11 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 26.6 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -0.4 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: The only hybrid vehicle in the Mazda lineup is a rebadged Ford Escape and, so far as we know, diesel hasn’face to face been considered an option. While the Mazda3 gets good mileage it’s at all times placed Zoom-Zoom over glug-glug.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Mitsubishi


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 29.5 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -12.5 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 26.1 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -0.9 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: The single saving grace for Mitsubishi, as it languishes in the U.S., is the iMiev full of fire car. But can the company produce enough electrics and hold outright long enough to make it economically feasible?


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Nissan


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 30.1/34.0 MPG (Import/Domestic)
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -11.9 MPG/ 8.0 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 23.5 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -3.5 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Nissan has built a reputation around their VQ V6 and don’t seem intent on taking it out of somewhat of their vehicles. To balance this, they’ll try to use the Nissan Cube and other small cars, but they’ll have to do more fully than the also-ran Sentra


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Porsche


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 27.0 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -15.0 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 19.3 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -7.7 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Porsche has historically been more content to pay fees than reform their ways given they’re a work brand. The lucrative Cayenne, as well, presents a challenge. They could combine with VW to raise the Porsche medium, but at the price of lowering VW’s.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Subaru


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 29.0 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -13.0 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 28.4 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -1.4 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Subaru builds cars disproportionately more fun than you’d look forward to and the popularity of vehicles preference the WRX and the lack of a small, under-powered economy car is a threat to the brand’s overall mileage. Could we see the return of the Justy hatchback?


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Suzuki


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 32.7 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -9.3 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 25.7 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -1.3 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: The current Suzuki lineup is such random and confusing it’s hard to know where they could doings. With the affront of the SX4 and Grand Vitara there aren’t any products with much note recognition. Just scrap the whole thing and gain us the Cappuccino.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Toyota


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 38.1/35.9 MPG (Import/Domestic)
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -3.9 MPG/6.1 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 25.8 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -1.2 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Unless Toyota discontinues the Prius and decides to frame the Tacoma V8-only, the automaker is moving in the right direction. Let’s just hope this doesn’t torpedo plans for a unused Supra although we fear it might.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


VW


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 30.2 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -11.8 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 23.9 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -3.1 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Volkswagen’s greatest environmental asset is the TDI engine. It’s greatest weakness is the haughty price of diesel fuel and the possibility of Americans turning on their technology. The greatest barrier on the horizon is Porsche, so we have power to’t imagine them combining.




Conclusion


Not a single automaker popularly meets 2016 standards for combustible matter economy. In passenger cars, only Toyota and Honda, who have larger fleets of fuel-efficient cars are less than 10 MPG not present from the proposed standards. This means companies will each have to radically alter their lineups, reduce the production of vehicles we actually want to drive, or invest heavily in choice propulsion systems at a time when their involving death is severely constrained. Good hazard with that! Appliance vehicles, here we advance!


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]



No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]

readmore...

Hoisting A 1965 Mustang To The Roof Of The Empire State Building [Retro]

Hoisting A 1965 Mustang To The Roof Of The Empire State Building [Retro]When Porsche put its Panamera on the 94th floor of the Shanghai World Financial Center, we thought it was pretty clever. Turns out Ford did the same with the Mustang, some 44 years earlier.



Unlike the Panamera lift which took place in a burden elevator with a complete automobile, Ford took by one’s self their Mustang and shipped it in pieces, by way of a people elevator, to the observation deck of the Empire State Building, then reassembled it.
The stunt was dreamed up by the operator of the Empire State Building and Ford happily jumped at the chance to publicize it’s even now wildly successful Mustang. Just goes to show how clever ideas aren’t unceasingly new ones.


The Mustang atop the Empire State Building


In October 1965, with the Ford Mustang the hottest-selling car in America, the general comptroller of the Empire State Building had a great idea – to pageant a Ford Mustang on the 86th floor experience deck of the iconic Manhattan landmark.


Officials at Ford agreed and dispatched a crew to copy was troubled measurements of the skyscraper’s doors, hallways and elevators. They determined that a white convertible Mustang could be disassembled into four mere sections and transported – along with many smaller pieces – up to the building’s 86th floor in elevators to be reassembled.


Three dry runs performed in Dearborn to make sure it would work. Then, at 10:30 p.hotch-potch. on Oct. 20, a Ford crew in curled white overalls began taking the car apart outside the building on 33rd Street.


It all ran smoothly until the crew discovered the steering column was one-quarter-inch too tall for the elevator. Some careful maneuvering was done and through 4:30 a.m., the reassembled car was on the outdoor observation deck and ready to be photographed from a helicopter.


But that wasn’t the end of the stunt. Later that sunrise, the car was taken apart another time and moved interior the glass-enclosed observation area that is surrounded by the outdoor deck.


Many of the building’s visitors were surprised and delighted to find a Mustang there and assumed it had been lifted into place by a helicopter.


Five months later, on March 16, 1966, the car was disassembled for the in conclusion time and removed from the building.


Since its debut in 1964, over nine million Mustangs have been sold but only one continually made it to the top of the Empire State Building.


-Leslie Armbruster, Senior Collections Archivist at Ford Motor Company



Hoisting A 1965 Mustang To The Roof Of The Empire State Building [Retro]


Hoisting A 1965 Mustang To The Roof Of The Empire State Building [Retro]



Hoisting A 1965 Mustang To The Roof Of The Empire State Building [Retro]

readmore...

2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful

Every time BMW redesigns the M3 the car becomes heavier and more cogent. And with the unveiling of each recently made known generation, a loud faction moans that BMW has ruined the car. Hard-core M3 fans inevitably complain that the unaccustomed model is moreover heavy, too complicated and not as much of a driver’sitting car. They invariably settle that the last rendition was better.


This latest M3 weighs a minimum of 3,704 pounds — the heaviest yet — and, when equipped through the navigation system comes saddled with the reviled iDrive interface. So it’s heavy and it has iDrive and must therefore be inferior to the silkily blameless old car, becoming?


Not quite. The new M3 ditches the raspy iron-block in-line 6 of its predecessor for a ringing aluminum V-8. The 4-liter engine makes 414 horsepower at a wild 8,300 r.p.m. This is not the type of car that will slam you back in the fundament at any engine speed — in fact, BMW’sitting turbocharged 335i in all probability feels faster around town much of the time.


2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful



But the M3 isn’t designed for the dragstrip, it’s optimized for the racetrack, whither its screaming high-end power, electronically controlled limited-slip differential and smooth torque delivery allow it to make the most of its prodigious output.


This really is a car you can commute in every day and then use on a track on weekends, and thoroughly enjoy in either milieu.
2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful
For maximum stealth and surprising value, the sedan is the sneaky star of the M3 lineup. It weighs only 22 pounds more than the coupe, so the performance is essentially identical. For reasons known only to BMW marketers, the sedan’s sticker — $55,625 — is a replete $3,000 less than its two-door tally. And that’s as close at the same time that the word “bargain” will aye come to describing an M3.
2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful
There’s also a hardtop convertible and a new dual-clutch transmission that is well-adapted to ascertain entirely in favor, especially for the sunshine seekers who use their race-bred 8,000-r.p.m. V-8s to troll along Collins Avenue in South Beach.


That is one drawback of the M3 — the number of people who buy it for the badge rather than the excellence that lies beneath the skin.


+ 2010 BMW M3 of Brabham Racing BT92 Road Test
+ 2009 BMW M3 Sedan Facelift Spyshots
+ BMW M3 Convertible 2009 Unveils
+ BMW 2008 M3 Saloon Unveiled at 2007 Tokyo Motor Show
+ 2008 BMW M3 Coupe Arrives in Kuwait
+ Nissan GTR,Porsche GT3,BMW M3, What Fastest?
+ BMW M3 vs Toyota Prius, Performance vs Fuel-Efficent
+ BMW M3 Concept on Geneva Auto Show (Video)
2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful
So the strange M3 is as amercement while ever, and still the target that everyone else is trying to hit. Yet despite the crowd of performance sedans now available, the biggest competitor for the M3 may be its own sibling, the 335i. Viewed rationally, that car looks similar, costs much less and has 95 percent of the performance.
2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful
Rationality aside, I know which motor I’d rather listen to for the life of a car loan. If you’re inclined toward the M3, just make sure you get one in the next few years.


Before they subvert it.


Gallery: 2009 BMW M3 Sedan



2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful2009 BMW M3 Sedan, Heavier and More Powerful

readmore...

/